| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Blood on their hands | |
| Posted by: | Adam Beamish | |
| Date/Time: | 29/06/12 09:46:00 |
| Jim, I'm a qualified planner, I'm not a qualified transport consultant, I made that distinction earlier on in this thread and expressed my 'common sense' view, which you then proceeded to insult. But, going back to the application, the relevant 'experts' (Highways Agency etc.) were all consulted on this application and all raised no highway safety concerns, hence why such concerns did not form part of the Officers recommended reasons for refusal. Again, everything in the above paragraph are facts. Yet again you try to insult me personally and my professional background. I think you owe me a big apology, but I don't for one minute expect one. In your account about your journey, a journey which we both make plenty of times, you never once refer to glancing left. At the bottom of the sliproad, the furthest west tower is at an angle of about 30 degrees to the drivers left, and is only glimpsed beyond buildings and vegetation. As you proceed up the ramp, either the towers are obscured totally by vegetation, or they are least at a 60 degree angle to the drivers left. Why would a driver be looking at 60 degree angle to their left (almost to the extent that they'd be looking out the passenger window) when the road is directly ahead and you are merging with traffic from the right ?. To be honest, your observations are so strange that I'm starting to wonder if you're confusing the Alfa Laval Tower (which is directly ahead when travelling up the sliproad) with the towers that are the subject of this thread ? |