| Topic: | Re:Is momentum supposed to be Labour? | |
| Posted by: | Vanessa Smith | |
| Date/Time: | 26/04/17 13:18:00 |
| From a letter I have just received from Ruth Cadbury M.P. the Momentum website that has been accused by 'Ms./Mr. Drick'of telling 'plenty of lies about Church St.' are not on their own. Ruth has said she 'has always remained neutral on the subject' (of Church St.), and 'that L.B.H. must make their decision only when they have verifiable data about the impact of the trial on the local roads'. She says she knows that someone quoted her at the recent IBAF meeting seeming to suggest that she supported the closure. That would be the pro-closure lobby who did indeed say that Ruth had said it was a 'win-win situation'. But not one of the local councillors present questioned this or called them out on this. Don't these people speak to Ruth? What about the Dear Leader? They really are something else, so they sit there - let people tell lies or take random quotes completely out of context and look like dummies. I don't know what is going on but for Labour councillors not to be seen to be diligent enough not to be taken in by dodgy data, and now it would seem, blatant lies, is truly appalling. Never mind Momentum Nicki - look a bit closer at your mates, not sure any of them would know the truth if it smacked them in the face. |