Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Common voters | |
Posted by: | Phil Andrews | |
Date/Time: | 11/04/16 20:10:00 |
Well I think it is pretty obvious by now that Suzi has no intention of backing up her allegation by naming names. Other forum users will draw their own conclusions from that, but it does make one wonder whether this reflects the level of honesty and integrity that we can expect from others in her group. Of course it could be the case that she has been genuinely misinformed or has made a sincere mistake in her recollection of events. In which case a person with any decency would apologise, and/or withdraw the erroneous allegation. There is nothing weak or dishonourable about apologising when we are wrong. Even common people understand that. |