Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:TfLs random dismissal of wise concerns
Posted by: Tim Barnes
Date/Time: 15/11/24 17:31:00

I responded to the Council / TfL consultation, and received a copy of the report this week. It’s very detailed, but unless I’m missing it, they have not agreed to one single change/modification based on the all the feedback they were given.

Every ‘point’ made by anyone seems to be simply dismissed.

I can’t help but conclude that they never intended to change anything, regardless of what was said, and regardless of it’s validity.

This consultation must have cost a fortune. I can spot a way of saving a great deal of money… Don’t spend it on consultations like this if you have no intention of changing anything. Better though, listen to the views of people who use these services, and who pay for the whole shebang through their taxes in the first place.

Just sayin’…

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
TfLs random dismissal of wise concerns14/11/24 18:03:00 Raymond Havelock
   Re:TfLs random dismissal of wise concerns15/11/24 17:12:00 Elizabeth Price
      Re:Re:TfLs random dismissal of wise concerns15/11/24 17:31:00 Tim Barnes
         Re:Re:Re:TfLs random dismissal of wise concerns15/11/24 21:54:00 Simon Hayes
            Re:Re:Re:Re:TfLs random dismissal of wise concerns16/11/24 14:08:00 David Cook
   Reply19/11/24 12:07:00 Michael Robinson
      Re:Reply19/11/24 14:53:00 Simon Hayes
         Reply19/11/24 17:04:00 Michael Robinson
            Re:Reply19/11/24 18:41:00 David Cook
               Re:Re:Reply20/11/24 10:27:00 Raymond Havelock
                  Reply20/11/24 21:48:00 Michael Robinson
                     Re:Reply20/11/24 23:36:00 Simon Hayes
                        Re:Re:Reply21/11/24 16:55:00 Kenneth Seally
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply22/11/24 12:00:00 Michael Robinson
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply22/11/24 15:42:00 Simon Hayes
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply22/11/24 22:44:00 Raymond Havelock
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply23/11/24 09:42:00 Michael Robinson
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply23/11/24 13:49:00 Jim Lawes
                                          Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply23/11/24 19:18:00 Jim Lawes
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply23/11/24 20:32:00 N V Brooks
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply24/11/24 21:11:00 Raymond Havelock
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply27/11/24 19:26:00 Simon Hayes

Forum Home