Whether it is legally correct or not, why remove something of history to replace with ugly inferior replacements? Just because something can be done doesn't always mean it should.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
More conservation damage in Brentford	07/03/12 12:07:00	Michael Brandt
Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	07/03/12 13:29:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	07/03/12 13:53:00	Jennifer Long
Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	07/03/12 18:12:00	Sarah Felstead
Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	07/03/12 18:32:00	Claire Peleschka
Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	07/03/12 19:14:00	Anthony Waller
Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	08/03/12 08:58:00	Adam Beamish
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	08/03/12 09:50:00	Claire Peleschka
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	08/03/12 10:19:00	John Connelly
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	08/03/12 10:43:00	Adam Beamish
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	09/03/12 11:02:00	Michael Brandt
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	09/03/12 20:38:00	Matt Harmer
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	10/03/12 06:17:00	Neil Chippendale
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	10/03/12 09:16:00	Michael Brandt
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	10/03/12 09:49:00	Neil Chippendale
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	14/03/12 08:26:00	Jennifer Long
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	14/03/12 10:07:00	Bernadette Paul
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	14/03/12 18:45:00	Michael Brandt
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:More conservation damage in Brentford	14/04/12 01:01:00	paul wilson

Forum Home