Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting
Posted by: Andrew Dakers
Date/Time: 24/11/12 17:30:00

"It is very difficult for the architects to explain complex concepts in brief answers. I mean no disrespect to the questioners and agreed with many of the points made but am not sure how the meeting helped to find the consensus on density, height, layout, content and detailed design which will be needed to get a scheme agreed."

I agree.  Working through the detail we must hope that Ballymore and their architects will have many more focussed meetings in the weeks and months ahead with Council officers, local groups and councillors to work through these issues.

The Guardian article was hardly a ringing endorsement, but ultimately Nine Elms is very different scheme and location to Brentford town centre.  Having visited Nine Elms the one think it did convince me of is that Ballymore can produce stylish interiors. 

Andrew


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 10:28:00 Andrea Hall
   Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 13:20:00 Kath Richardson
      Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 14:09:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 20:18:00 Steve Bullman
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 20:28:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 21:40:00 Steve Bullman
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 22:01:00 Anthony Waller
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 22:20:00 Keith Iddon
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 22:59:00 Anthony Waller
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 23:13:00 Keith Iddon
                           :Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 23:47:00 Andrea Hall
                              Re::Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201222/11/12 23:52:00 Keith Iddon
                                 Re:Re::Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201223/11/12 08:45:00 Anthony Waller
                              Re::Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201223/11/12 08:53:00 Kath Richardson
   Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting - on my iPad23/11/12 09:09:00 Cllr Ruth Cadbury
      Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 23/11/12 10:03:00 Kath Richardson
         Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 23/11/12 12:24:00 Chris Calvi-Freeman
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 23/11/12 19:50:00 Iain Muir
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 23/11/12 22:36:00 Kath Richardson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 23/11/12 22:45:00 Iain Muir
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 24/11/12 10:29:00 Kath Richardson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 24/11/12 17:30:00 Andrew Dakers
   Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201224/11/12 10:56:00 Michael Brandt
   Re:Opinions from Regeneration meeting 21 November 201224/11/12 21:22:00 Nick Walker

Forum Home