| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:David Cameron was ordered to pay back MORE than Ann Keen | |
| Posted by: | Stephanie Kitsune | |
| Date/Time: | 11/03/10 22:41:00 |
| You're right it probably won't convince me, but if you wouldn't mind sparing the time then just humour me for a brief subjective instance... If you don't want to talk about the expenses claims then that's ok. How about we talk about how someone who seems such a great believer in human rights, peace and equality (an opinion you have quite admirably expressed on many occasions) can feel it appropriate to show such unwavering support for and defend so vehemently someone who voted for the war in Iraq, you may try to argue that for some reason it was necessary to go to war (I wouldn't believe you, nor do I think you would really believe yourself..) but any logic Ann may have mistakenly seen in going to war is irrelevant because she then went on to vote VERY STRONGLY AGAINST an investigation into the war in Iraq after allegations of war crimes etc. Could you justify that? I apologise to everyone that this is a little off-topic, I just wanted to make it clear that personally my issues with the Keens are not restricted to their fraudulent (and you can dress it up any way you like, saying you spend at least 2 nights a week in a house with no bathroom, no furniture, no electricity and most of the floorboards missing is a big fat lie. Even my 3 year old could tell you that's a lie.) expenses claims, but with their immoral voting habits and their blatant disinterested, part-time attitude towards their constituents. Also, now that they can no longer have their second homes money as they've been well and truly rumbled on that front, does that mean they will move back to Brenford full time or stay in their Waterloo apartment and sell up on Brook Rd South? 'Good to see your name on the W4 forum, btw.' Long time listener, first time caller. Did you like Cheesus? |