Forum Message

Topic: Watermans v Social Housing
Forum Home
Posted by: Martin Case
Date/Time: 30/10/17 12:16:00

Am I right in thinking both the Watermans and Max Factor site freehold was/is owned by LBH? If so should not the priority and responsibility of LBH be to use these assets to fund much needed social (not affordable) housing, rather than using these sites as a funding programme for an arts centre who currently struggle to survive unless subsidised by LBH, and with no transparent business plan as to why they are optimistic in believing their best chance of survival is to move?


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 12:16:00 Martin Case
   Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 14:46:00 Barry Jacques
      Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 16:32:00 Martin Case
         Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 17:06:00 Barry Jacques
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:49:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:53:00 Barry Jacques
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 23:02:00 Theo Dennison
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 11:25:00 Martin Case
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/11/17 00:43:00 Theo Dennison
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/11/17 18:40:00 Barry Jacques
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 16:59:00 Theo Dennison
   Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 17:43:00 Martin Case
      Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 18:43:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 19:47:00 Martin Case
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 20:10:00 Raki Smith
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:19:00 Keith Iddon
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:48:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 07:54:00 Martin Case
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 08:12:00 Lorne Gifford
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 12:16:00 Keith Iddon
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 23:08:00 Theo Dennison
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 13:17:00 Raymond Havelock
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 16:15:00 Mark Skuse
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 18:44:00 Keith Iddon
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 18:52:00 Martin Case
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 19:04:00 Keith Iddon
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 23:12:00 Susan Kelly
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 09:11:00 Emma Renton
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 12:28:00 Keith Iddon
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 14:59:00 Jennifer Selig
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing03/12/17 13:41:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/12/17 20:38:00 Martin Webb

Forum Home