Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing
Posted by: Theo Dennison
Date/Time: 04/11/17 16:59:00

It is, LBH are committed to increasing the number of council owned and social housing units and the same model, where we reinvest the return on investments back into council owned or social homes is now the norm where for example Council owned sites are being developed e.g. Most recently Nantley house.

Block D will be built out as LBH owned social housing in it entirety - it is part of the agreement with Ballymore.

There is no easy way to compare the two as the ownership profiles and agreements involved are very different - The Block D model is what you might expect when a developer brings forward a large development involving some council assets, the Watermans model where the Council's stake is a more substantial proportion of the whole.  Block D is just a fraction of the overall 'south of the high street' development.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 12:16:00 Martin Case
   Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 14:46:00 Barry Jacques
      Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 16:32:00 Martin Case
         Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 17:06:00 Barry Jacques
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:49:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:53:00 Barry Jacques
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 23:02:00 Theo Dennison
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 11:25:00 Martin Case
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/11/17 00:43:00 Theo Dennison
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/11/17 18:40:00 Barry Jacques
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 16:59:00 Theo Dennison
   Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 17:43:00 Martin Case
      Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 18:43:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 19:47:00 Martin Case
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 20:10:00 Raki Smith
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:19:00 Keith Iddon
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:48:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 07:54:00 Martin Case
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 08:12:00 Lorne Gifford
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 12:16:00 Keith Iddon
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 23:08:00 Theo Dennison
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 13:17:00 Raymond Havelock
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 16:15:00 Mark Skuse
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 18:44:00 Keith Iddon
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 18:52:00 Martin Case
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 19:04:00 Keith Iddon
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 23:12:00 Susan Kelly
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 09:11:00 Emma Renton
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 12:28:00 Keith Iddon
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 14:59:00 Jennifer Selig
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing03/12/17 13:41:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/12/17 20:38:00 Martin Webb

Forum Home