Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing
Posted by: Martin Case
Date/Time: 31/10/17 18:52:00

I think the question we're all asking is Watermans a facility that's fits for purpose and right for the community it's supposed to serve - and more importantly at what cost?

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 12:16:00 Martin Case
   Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 14:46:00 Barry Jacques
      Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 16:32:00 Martin Case
         Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 17:06:00 Barry Jacques
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:49:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:53:00 Barry Jacques
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 23:02:00 Theo Dennison
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 11:25:00 Martin Case
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/11/17 00:43:00 Theo Dennison
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/11/17 18:40:00 Barry Jacques
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 16:59:00 Theo Dennison
   Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 17:43:00 Martin Case
      Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 18:43:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 19:47:00 Martin Case
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 20:10:00 Raki Smith
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:19:00 Keith Iddon
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing30/10/17 22:48:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 07:54:00 Martin Case
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 08:12:00 Lorne Gifford
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 12:16:00 Keith Iddon
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 23:08:00 Theo Dennison
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 13:17:00 Raymond Havelock
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 16:15:00 Mark Skuse
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 18:44:00 Keith Iddon
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 18:52:00 Martin Case
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing31/10/17 19:04:00 Keith Iddon
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing04/11/17 23:12:00 Susan Kelly
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 09:11:00 Emma Renton
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 12:28:00 Keith Iddon
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing05/11/17 14:59:00 Jennifer Selig
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing03/12/17 13:41:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans v Social Housing01/12/17 20:38:00 Martin Webb

Forum Home