Topic: | Re:Re:Cllr. Curran must need therapy | |
Posted by: | Raymond Havelock | |
Date/Time: | 26/07/13 23:11:00 |
He's either a completely naive Mug or there's something very fishy going on. Did something like this not happen before in the last decade and it turned out that the recipients of such grants were multiple landlords who were all related to party members? Surely this is not all going on again? Either way it's an utterly stupid way to help a housing problem. As has been mentioned. Is a landlord who lets a place go empty or keeps properties in unhabitable conditions a fit and proper person to be a landlord for any market private or social? They are almost certainly using the property as a tax loss. If they are decalaring tax on multiple properties in the first instance. Will Cllr. Curran & Co. be ensuring all tax liabilities are declared and payments are vetted? Will the recipient landlords be made public to those funding them? Should they be rewarded and with taxpayers money? What signal does that send out? Stupid and if it's not, it must be some scam. |