Forum Message

Topic: :Re:Re:Roadworks and communication
Posted by: Steve Taylor
Date/Time: 02/04/12 23:15:00

"If you or I send an email from work it should have a big disclaimer at the bottom, and letters from the Council have/should have been checked by management prior to being sent out.  You can't do that with website contributions"

Hi Adam

Herein lines the problem as I see it. I had no idea that every letter from the Council has to be checked by management prior to be sent out. How many private companies or indeed PLCs can afford to operate in such a manner in this day and age?  Little wonder our Councils plead poverty if they can afford so many 'jobworths'  to check every letter.

I agree that most Co's have disclaimers on emails but I can't see why contributions or info posted by officers for public information on forums can't also have such disclaimers. Its not rocket science. All that is required is that Senior officers encourage their subordinates to engage with their paymasters (i.e. the public) and supply them with a general disclaimer to cut and paste at the foot of their post. Council's really need to move into the 21st century.

Obviously all these Directors and Assistant Directors and Heads of Department on enormous salaries are just trying to justify their jobs as 'letter checkers'. The Councils simply can't afford all these people anymore. In the real world in the private sector such positions are being made redundant by the day.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Roadworks and communication27/03/12 18:15:00 Paul Fisher
   Re:Roadworks and communication27/03/12 18:22:00 Vanessa Smith
      Re:Re:Roadworks and communication27/03/12 21:14:00 Keith Iddon
   Re:Roadworks and communication28/03/12 08:06:00 Jim Linwood
      Re:Re:Roadworks and communication28/03/12 21:50:00 Phil Andrews
         Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication28/03/12 22:40:00 Claire Peleschka
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication28/03/12 22:45:00 Phil Andrews
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication28/03/12 23:22:00 Claire Peleschka
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication29/03/12 01:39:00 Keith Iddon
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication29/03/12 08:33:00 Adam Beamish
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication29/03/12 10:18:00 Vanessa Smith
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication29/03/12 16:30:00 Phil Andrews
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Osborne is a cretin29/03/12 18:08:00 Vanessa Smith
                                 Government is stark raving bonkers.29/03/12 20:10:00 Sarah Felstead
                                    Re:Government is stark raving bonkers.30/03/12 12:59:00 Patricia Nicholas
                                    Re:Government is stark raving bonkers.30/03/12 15:30:00 Vanessa Smith
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication29/03/12 20:30:00 Steve Taylor
         Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication30/03/12 12:56:00 Katherine Kaufman
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication30/03/12 13:09:00 Keith Iddon
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication30/03/12 15:33:00 Vanessa Smith
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication30/03/12 20:31:00 Steve Taylor
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication31/03/12 16:57:00 Vanessa Smith
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication31/03/12 20:51:00 Tim Henderson
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication02/04/12 14:29:00 Vanessa Smith
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication02/04/12 15:04:00 Adam Beamish
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication02/04/12 18:41:00 Paul Fisher
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Roadworks and communication03/04/12 12:37:00 Vanessa Smith
                  :Re:Re:Roadworks and communication02/04/12 23:15:00 Steve Taylor

Forum Home