Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read
Posted by: Louise John
Date/Time: 27/04/09 11:18:00

I have contacted Sarah directly with my concerns regarding St Paul's Park. However, I felt compelled to respond on the topic of "un-neutered" males being blamed for aggression. I have an "un-neutered" male Basset Hound who show's absolutely no aggression whatsoever and is so submissive he can play in the park with some of the dog's other dog owners avoid like the plague. My husband and I have discussed it at length and having consulted the vet and considered the pro's and con's have no intention of having him neutered. It is not true that neutering a male dog will always destroy his urge to mount female dogs or that it will reduce aggression. It can help in some cases but is no substitute for the council enforcing the law's regarding dangerous dogs. Aggression is learnt and also responsive behaviour. It is up to owners to control aggressive behaviour and muzzle dangerous animals. Female dogs are just as capable of being aggressive as male dogs, off the top of my head I can think of two female dogs who regularly visit St Paul's Park that I would not walk my dog with. One of them is the dog that Sarah has referred to and who snapped at her Jack Russell. Unfortunately, as many people have pointed out the owners are often as un-pleasant as their dog's.

I do agree with Mary that some owners over-react, I guess I have taken the odd risk with my dog to allow him to be put in his place; for example I let a female Rhodesian Ridgeback do it and now they are the best of friends. However, I did that at my own risk and am not suggesting other people should do the same. I think it is also worth mentioning that there are friendly staffordshire bull terriers that visit the park and they are not the only breed responsible for aggressive behaviour. My dog was nipped by a Yorkshire terrier so little dog's are not without fault.

Ultimately, both the police and the council need to enforce the law. One point that hasn't been raised is that a number of vicious dog's live in social housing. My Mum live's in social housing and had to obtain permission to have her dog and was warned that if any complaints were received the council would investigate. Clearly this is not happening in our borough???? I have seen police support officers in the park recently but they appeared to be chatting and eating their lunch rather than investigating dangerous dog's!


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read11/03/09 18:49:00 Sarah Brownlee
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 13:17:00 Sarah Brownlee
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 15:12:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 15:52:00 Alistair Fergusson
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 17:22:00 Mick Brent
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 20:07:00 Sarah Brownlee
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 20:01:00 Sarah Brownlee
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 20:41:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 21:00:00 Sarah Brownlee
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/03/09 19:17:00 Matt Harmer
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read24/03/09 15:58:00 Beccy Thorp
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read25/03/09 20:46:00 Michael Brandt
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read25/03/09 22:08:00 Adam Beamish
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read25/03/09 23:22:00 Michael Brandt
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read25/03/09 22:13:00 Sarah Brownlee
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read26/03/09 11:12:00 Markus Mason
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read26/03/09 11:14:00 Markus Mason
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read26/03/09 23:27:00 Sarah Brownlee
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read27/03/09 23:13:00 Sarah Brownlee
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read28/03/09 14:09:00 Stephen Browne
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read28/03/09 17:49:00 Sarah Brownlee
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read29/03/09 20:40:00 Steve Taylor
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read29/03/09 23:19:00 Sarah Brownlee
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 10:59:00 Niel Gavin
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 13:11:00 Sarah Brownlee
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 13:15:00 Sarah Brownlee
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 13:59:00 Matt Harmer
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 14:52:00 Jane Chang
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 16:21:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 16:25:00 Sarah Brownlee
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 17:29:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read03/04/09 20:51:00 Steve Taylor
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 11:54:00 Mary OConnor
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read27/04/09 11:18:00 Louise John
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 13:44:00 Niel Gavin
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 17:14:00 Sarah Brownlee
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 18:29:00 Adam Beamish
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 22:08:00 Sarah Brownlee
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 22:45:00 Steve Taylor
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 22:48:00 Sarah Brownlee
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read09/04/09 23:38:00 Adam Beamish
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read10/04/09 00:36:00 Sarah Brownlee
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read10/04/09 00:23:00 Michael Brandt
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read13/04/09 21:48:00 Steve Taylor
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read14/04/09 08:21:00 Stephen Browne
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read14/04/09 17:16:00 Sarah Brownlee
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read14/04/09 20:07:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read14/04/09 20:47:00 Adam Beamish
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read19/04/09 16:47:00 Steve Taylor
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read19/04/09 17:51:00 Michael Brandt
   Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read24/04/09 18:18:00 Sarah Brownlee
      Re:Re:Dangerous Dogs - A Serious Problem, please read25/04/09 08:37:00 Steve Taylor
         ?15/06/09 03:03:00 Sarah Brownlee

Forum Home