Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development
Posted by: Paul Fisher
Date/Time: 03/03/14 07:41:00

My personal opinion is that any offices that have been unsued for years should at least be considered to be converted in to much needed housing as long as the design,mass, and charactor of the area is kept but of course developers want to make as much money as possible

I am sure Adam will correct me if I am wrong but if this or any other proposed development involves just converting an office building to housing without demolishing it first then planning permission is not then required and we could then end up with anything that the developer wishes

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 07:12:00 Paul Fisher
   Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 13:29:00 Steve Taylor
      Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 14:56:00 Phil Andrews
         Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 15:51:00 Steve Taylor
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 16:05:00 Terry Watson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 16:27:00 Phil Andrews
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 18:44:00 Ian Silver
         Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development26/02/14 22:15:00 Guy Lambert
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development27/02/14 08:50:00 Paul Fisher
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development27/02/14 11:54:00 Steve Taylor
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 02:47:00 Jim Lawes
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 07:47:00 Guy Lambert
                        :Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 09:40:00 John Todd
                           Re::Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 20:32:00 Jim Lawes
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 20:22:00 Jim Lawes
                           :Re:Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 20:42:00 Jim Lawes
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 21:34:00 Phil Andrews
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development02/03/14 23:02:00 Jim Lawes
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development03/03/14 07:41:00 Paul Fisher
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development06/03/14 00:36:00 Jim Lawes
                                       Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development08/03/14 21:36:00 Jim Lawes
                                          Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 09:43:00 Phil Andrews
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 19:58:00 Jim Lawes
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 20:45:00 Phil Andrews
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 20:50:00 Jim Lawes
                                                      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 22:50:00 Phil Andrews
                                          Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 09:43:00 Steve Taylor
                                          Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 11:47:00 Vanessa Smith
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 12:02:00 Steve Taylor
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proposed Swan Court Development09/03/14 13:15:00 Phil Andrews

Forum Home