Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | |
Posted by: | Jeremy Parkinson | |
Date/Time: | 13/06/24 18:09:00 |
Okay perhaps I was being too optimistic about the fire and now with the squatters the situation may be irretrievable. Whatever state the building is in when they leave the council will now have to stump up for 24/7 probably on site security going forward which will be expensive and increase the temptation to cut their losses and demolish the building. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 06/06/24 17:21:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 09:33:00 | Keith Iddon |
Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 13:45:00 | Tim Barnes |
Re:Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 17:00:00 | Hazel Dakers |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 18:10:00 | Keith Iddon |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 23:24:00 | Peter Evans |
Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 07:32:00 | Simon Hayes |
Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 12:22:00 | Keith Iddon |
Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 13:24:00 | Anne England |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 22:13:00 | Jim Lawes |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 13/06/24 18:09:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 13/06/24 22:52:00 | Jim Lawes |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 14/06/24 11:30:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 14/06/24 12:19:00 | Rosemary Ward |