| Topic: | Re:Re:Watermans squatters | |
| Posted by: | Keith Iddon | |
| Date/Time: | 11/06/24 12:22:00 |
| You might be excused from thinking that the council might have known in the light of previous experience,that squatters were bound to move in,as they also have at the Sauki restaurant site.It will mean more expense,more delays,more red tape blah blah blah so it might just suit their purposes,if they know what those purposes are that is.They don't seem to have a clue how to progress the situation so they can sit on their hands and blame squatters. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 06/06/24 17:21:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 09:33:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 13:45:00 | Tim Barnes |
| Re:Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 17:00:00 | Hazel Dakers |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 18:10:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans Fire - an opportunity? | 07/06/24 23:24:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 07:32:00 | Simon Hayes |
| Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 12:22:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 13:24:00 | Anne England |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 11/06/24 22:13:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 13/06/24 18:09:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 13/06/24 22:52:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 14/06/24 11:30:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Watermans squatters | 14/06/24 12:19:00 | Rosemary Ward |