Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | |
Posted by: | Raymond Havelock | |
Date/Time: | 22/09/22 09:40:00 |
It works and does what was intended. It's the appearance, and structure that is problematic. The graffiti is external and can't be seen from the user position. ( It can be seen from the tube) But removing it damages the panels and causes swift corrosion. Costly to do. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Bridge across Canal | 13/09/22 13:46:00 | Paul Lang |
Re:Bridge across Canal | 16/09/22 14:43:00 | Jim Lawes |
Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 16/09/22 15:10:00 | Paul Lang |
Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 16/09/22 19:33:00 | Jim Lawes |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 16/09/22 20:13:00 | Raymond Havelock |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 18/09/22 10:08:00 | Sue Rowe |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 18/09/22 19:45:00 | Jim Lawes |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 19/09/22 00:50:00 | Guy Lambert |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 19/09/22 00:51:00 | Guy Lambert |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 19/09/22 00:51:00 | Guy Lambert |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 20/09/22 11:19:00 | Paul Garnham |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 21/09/22 08:31:00 | Raymond Havelock |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 21/09/22 11:45:00 | Paul Garnham |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 21/09/22 12:09:00 | Peter Evans |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bridge across Canal | 22/09/22 09:40:00 | Raymond Havelock |