Topic: | Re:Re:Smart Motorways | |
Posted by: | Christopher Gillie | |
Date/Time: | 30/01/20 23:49:00 |
We started off with a really bad model - build narrow and then widen, so that slip roads, bridges etc need to be re-built at any time we want to add a lane. A far better model would have been to build wide apart with the space between the carriageways separated with enough space to add a couple of lanes each way. In that way, the hard shoulder, on and off ramps/slipways, bridges etc would not have to be re-built. It is this precisely the cost of all these things that led to the promotion of "smart" motorways as a way of avoiding upgrade costs. Short term thinking = long term costs. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Smart Motorways | 30/01/20 07:38:00 | Nicholas Beard |
Re:Smart Motorways | 30/01/20 15:59:00 | Philippa Bond |
Re:Re:Smart Motorways | 30/01/20 23:49:00 | Christopher Gillie |
Re:Re:Re:Smart Motorways | 13/02/20 21:29:00 | Philippa Bond |
Reply | 13/02/20 21:44:00 | N V Brooks |
Smart Motorways | 14/02/20 12:33:00 | Philip Coe |
Re:Smart Motorways | 15/02/20 08:49:00 | Philippa Bond |
Re:Re:Smart Motorways | 15/02/20 09:03:00 | Nicholas Beard |
Reply | 15/02/20 11:02:00 | N V Brooks |
Re:Reply | 15/02/20 12:50:00 | Jennifer Selig |
Re:Re:Re:Smart Motorways | 11/03/20 06:54:00 | Nicholas Beard |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Smart Motorways | 11/03/20 18:37:00 | Philippa Bond |