My point precisely. I suspect that it's possibly an 'advisory' notice of some sort, from their action in backing off I would seriously doubt that it's a mandatory requirement or they wouldn't have done it. But then that begs another questions why be in such a hurry to waste so much money? Traffic Orders are very expensive to do.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
You could not make it up part 71	22/01/14 18:05:00	Paul Fisher
Re:You could not make it up part 71	22/01/14 18:17:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:You could not make it up part 71	22/01/14 18:22:00	Anthony Waller
Re:Re:Re:You could not make it up part 71	22/01/14 18:25:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:Re:Re:You could not make it up part 71	22/01/14 18:46:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification	22/01/14 19:42:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification	22/01/14 22:04:00	Phil Andrews
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification	22/01/14 22:10:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification	23/01/14 23:19:00	David Giles
Common sense and people power prevails!!	24/01/14 15:43:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Common sense and people power prevails!!	24/01/14 18:15:00	Phil Andrews
Re:Re:Common sense and people power prevails!!	24/01/14 23:02:00	Jim Lawes
The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	24/01/14 23:09:00	Jim Lawes
Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	25/01/14 09:02:00	Tim Henderson
Re:Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	25/01/14 11:42:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:Re:Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	27/01/14 04:53:00	Phil Andrews
Re:Re:Re:Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	27/01/14 10:28:00	Vanessa Smith
Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	25/01/14 12:29:00	Keith Iddon
Re:Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	26/01/14 21:47:00	Steve Taylor
Re:Re:Re:The poor old Bridge at Mill Plat was under threat (picture)	27/01/14 10:03:00	Vanessa Smith

Forum Home