| Topic: | Re:Re:Young Boy Raped behind Nat West Bank yesterday evening | |
| Posted by: | Philip Walsh | |
| Date/Time: | 14/06/11 12:36:00 |
| Yes free Masons look after them selves at the expense of every one else; that's the problem. Vanessa under the the Human Rights act no one is permitted to dispense 'justice' other than a Judge or trained Magistrate, so I find your claim odd. I am glad you are not a Free Mason and know from your postings of your views, however as you say "In my husband's case he was nominated, not elected'. Not appointed in a transparent process! Who exactly Nominated him! wasn't me or any one I know. Did any one get a chance to object, was his appointment well publicised so they could. In what way is he better than me or any one else, that justifies him sitting in judgement on the rest of us. I believe that you both may have an opinion over legalisation but that would not prevent him writing a warrant on me or any other families home would it!! It wouldn't stop him handing over the case to the Crown Court and avoiding compromising his opinion. Opinions aren't worth a crap if you are unwilling to stand up for them. I can say and I speak for many in my family if we had known old man Smith's son would sit where he does, he would have been told where to stick his paraffin; we would have rather have frozen than to have handed what little money we had growing up to to your husbands dad. Nothing personal, just like his name on a warrant to abuse isn't! |