| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | |
| Posted by: | Raymond Havelock | |
| Date/Time: | 28/11/22 16:01:00 |
| It was disgusting even in the mid 1970s. It stank. If the were fish from a store and a high tide they were always dead. It got far worse after dredging stopped. The polluted stuff - the really nasty stuff is now not washed away but way under millions of tonnes of sediment sludge, itself mostly made from sewer outlets. You won't find that in a Ballymore brochure. The way in which it's been cleaned up and regenerated ecologically is a great achievement. But once that was done no time was lost in gentrifying it and turning it into a developers marketing tool. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Mudlarking in the Thames | 28/11/22 05:45:00 | Nicholas Beard |
| Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | 28/11/22 08:53:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | 28/11/22 09:17:00 | Guy Lambert |
| Re:Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | 28/11/22 09:30:00 | Raymond Havelock |
| Re:Re:Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | 28/11/22 10:21:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | 28/11/22 16:01:00 | Raymond Havelock |
| Re:Mudlarking in the Thames | 29/11/22 10:13:00 | Ben Halloren |