Topic: | Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | |
Posted by: | Adam Beamish | |
Date/Time: | 03/02/10 12:33:00 |
First time I've seen it today since the scaffolding was removed. Just my personal opinion but I think it looks awful. Not the Lucozade sign, but the additional storey that it's been installed on. Almost as though to find a location close by the sign's historical position it's okay to put an extra storey comprising a brightly painted bland rectangular block within a row of buildings which are all considerably lower. Horrible :-( And I'm still slightly amused by the whole 'fondness' for the Lucozade sign yet the general opposition towards other new advertisements along the same highways corridor. As I say, just my personal views, but I don't like it. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 02/02/10 21:50:00 | Eric Dicker |
Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 03/02/10 12:33:00 | Adam Beamish |
Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 03/02/10 12:36:00 | Adam Beamish |
Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 03/02/10 14:21:00 | Vanessa Smith |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 03/02/10 21:17:00 | Neil Chippendale |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 03/02/10 21:32:00 | Adam Beamish |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 04/02/10 02:00:00 | Audrey Walton |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 15/02/10 11:30:00 | Adam Beamish |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 18/02/10 17:49:00 | Michael Brandt |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lucozade Clock / Thermometer | 21/02/10 19:40:00 | Adam Beamish |