| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | |
| Posted by: | Nigel Moore | |
| Date/Time: | 23/03/06 12:29:00 |
| Colin you would need to read through previous topics on this subject to get a fuller picture than any single brief posting could provide. Both the PLA and the Council have the power either singly or together to do something about the wrecks, but as Matt has pointed out, they don't see the point of making room for more derelicts to be dumped there. I don't agree with that rationale, but that's what they use to avoid what would necessarily be a costly exercise. The Council are hoping to encourage private developer interest in establishing properly regulated and controlled moorings here, and movement on this seems likely in the near future. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 20/03/06 14:41:00 | Colin Murphy |
| Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 20/03/06 16:32:00 | Ian Roberts |
| Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 20/03/06 16:52:00 | Matt Harmer |
| Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 20/03/06 18:32:00 | Ian Roberts |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 23/03/06 09:58:00 | The Pseudometer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 23/03/06 10:05:00 | The Pseudometer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 23/03/06 12:29:00 | Nigel Moore |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 23/03/06 14:28:00 | The Pseudometer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman's Park and derelict boats | 25/03/06 10:29:00 | Nigel Moore |