Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Waterman’s
Posted by: Guy Lambert
Date/Time: 07/10/24 17:52:00

Chris, first it was never in the basement (except the earliest version had a larger theatre which used some underground parts because the Arts Council were originally looking for a 500 person audience capacity) but on the ground floor.
There was a thorough business plan produced by expert arts consultants, though it being financially viable was always debatable (and would always depend on subsidies, as Watermans always have). I agree having a cinema round the corner is another challenge, but the trustees (and consultants) were aware of that at the time they produced the business plan.
Using ST Lawrence Church was investigated, partly on my suggestion but it was clear to people who understand these matters that it is not viable, though of course would potentially be an option for amateur groups etc.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Waterman’s 04/10/24 16:55:00 Simon Hayes
   Re:Waterman’s 04/10/24 17:10:00 Kenneth Seally
      Re:Re:Waterman’s 04/10/24 18:12:00 Joanne Sky
         Re:Re:Re:Waterman’s 04/10/24 18:31:00 Vanessa Smith
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Waterman’s 04/10/24 19:16:00 Simon Hayes
   Re:Waterman’s 07/10/24 16:48:00 Chris Dakers
      Re:Re:Waterman’s 07/10/24 17:52:00 Guy Lambert
   Re:Waterman’s 11/10/24 11:49:00 Alex Marshall
      Re:Re:Waterman’s 17/10/24 22:41:00 Raymond Havelock
         Re:Re:Re:Waterman’s 18/10/24 10:34:00 Kenneth Seally

Forum Home