Forum Message

Topic: Re:The Brook Stream.(super enlarged Map).
Posted by: Michael Brandt
Date/Time: 27/11/12 01:29:00

That seems to confirm all that Anthony Waller had revealed. Especially the use of water for the engine yard.
It may also explain why the Lateward road / Brook road end of  St Pauls rec was never built on. The land undulates to that point and no doubt was boggy.

The La Tewards did not bequeath the park until after Lateward road was built so it is possible it was too costly to drain the land. Hence it's donation - there's always a catch.

It does explain what both the Lateward Road and Brook Road sites remained unbuilt on post war. The density of the area made infrastructure works difficult with nowhere to place installations.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding06/11/12 20:22:00 Anthony Waller
   Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding06/11/12 22:07:00 Sarah Felstead
   Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding07/11/12 07:47:00 Jim Linwood
      Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding07/11/12 14:13:00 Anthony Waller
         Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding07/11/12 18:30:00 Reg Ghosh
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 00:10:00 Anthony Waller
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 09:02:00 Reg Ghosh
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 10:23:00 Neil Chippendale
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 11:54:00 Tim Henderson
   Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 18:44:00 Rod de St Croix
      Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 18:48:00 Neil Chippendale
         Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 21:38:00 Anthony Waller
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 21:48:00 Neil Chippendale
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding08/11/12 22:58:00 Jim Lawes
      Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding09/11/12 09:31:00 Tim Henderson
   Vote? What vote?08/11/12 21:54:00 Michael Brandt
      Re:Vote? What vote?09/11/12 09:41:00 Anthony Waller
         1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...12/11/12 14:34:00 Jim Lawes
            Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...12/11/12 15:10:00 Tim Henderson
               Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...12/11/12 16:59:00 Anthony Waller
                  Re:Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...12/11/12 17:56:00 Tim Henderson
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...12/11/12 18:04:00 Jim Lawes
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...12/11/12 18:57:00 Anthony Waller
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...13/11/12 12:06:00 Jim Linwood
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...13/11/12 12:14:00 Michael Brandt
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:1894 Map showing The "bubbling" Brook ...13/11/12 17:55:00 Anthony Waller
                                 An even earlier Map showing how the Brook Stream flows..27/11/12 00:50:00 Jim Lawes
                                    The Brook Stream.(super enlarged Map).27/11/12 00:52:00 Jim Lawes
                                       Re:The Brook Stream.(super enlarged Map).27/11/12 01:29:00 Michael Brandt
                                          Re:Re:The Brook Stream.(super enlarged Map).29/11/12 10:42:00 Neil Chippendale
                                             Re:Re:Re:The Brook Stream.(super enlarged Map).29/11/12 12:40:00 Jim Lawes
   Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding21/12/12 14:04:00 myra vivien savin
      Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding21/12/12 14:48:00 Anthony Waller
      Re:Re:Brook Rd Sth development may risk flooding25/12/12 04:35:00 Neil Chippendale

Forum Home