| Topic: | Re:Re:Breach of civil liberties? | |
| Posted by: | Raymond Havelock | |
| Date/Time: | 07/03/26 22:52:00 |
| I read your blog after posting. But spent 3 days trying to find out and clearly learned more than you know. Which is disappointing. After all, you are a ward councillor and have far more direct access than ordinary mortals in the district. The notice in itself is vague as cowboy clamper notices and the 3 months data held? How secure is it and to whom is it distributed to? If they are not permitted why have these been live for 4 days? Do you know anymore than I or anyone else locally what has exactly been gathered and exactly why? Have you seen a clear written detailed explanation in full, of the intent of the 'survey' With your access as an elected voting member of the Council surely you can actually answer much deeper than you clearly actually know. So do what I have done, and investigate and then please explain in your Blog exactly is "misleading". Misleading is dismissing concerns. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Breach of civil liberties? | 06/03/26 15:26:00 | Raymond Havelock |
| Re:Breach of civil liberties? | 07/03/26 20:48:00 | Guy Lambert |
| Re:Re:Breach of civil liberties? | 07/03/26 22:52:00 | Raymond Havelock |
| Re:Re:Re:Breach of civil liberties? | 09/03/26 16:08:00 | Guy Lambert |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Breach of civil liberties? | 10/03/26 02:40:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Breach of civil liberties? | 10/03/26 12:54:00 | Raymond Havelock |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Breach of civil liberties? | 10/03/26 13:47:00 | Simon Hayes |